Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1143620130170020010
Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
2013 Volume.17 No. 2 p.10 ~ p.14
Comparison of SUV for PET/MRI and PET/CT
Kim Jae-Il

Jeon Jae-Hwan
Kim In-Soo
Lee Hong-Jae
Kim Jin-Eui
Abstract
Purpose: Due to developed simultaneous PET/MRI, it has become possible to obtain more anatomical image information better than conventional PET/CT. By the way, in the PET/CT, the linear absorption coefficient is measured by X-ray directly. However in case of PET/MRI, the value is not measured from MRI images directly, but is calculated by dividing as 4 segmentation ¥ì-map. Therefore, in this paper, we will evaluate the SUV's difference of attenuation correction PET images from PET/MRI and PET/CT.

Materials and Methods: Biograph mCT40 (Siemens, Germany), Biograph mMR were used as a PET/CT, PET/MRI scanner. For a phantom study, we used a solid type 68Ge source, and a liquid type 18F uniformity phantom. By using VIBE-DIXON sequence of PET/MRI, human anatomical structure was divided into air-lung-fat-soft tissue for attenuation correction coefficient. In case of PET/CT, the hounsfield unit of CT was used. By setting the ROI at five places of each PET phantom images that is corrected attenuation, the maximum SUV was measured, evaluated %diff about PET/CT vs. PET/MRI. In clinical study, the 18 patients who underwent simultaneous PET/CT and PET/MRI was selected and set the ROI at background, lung, liver, brain, muscle, fat, bone from the each attenuation correction PET images, and then evaluated, compared by measuring the maximum SUV.

Results: For solid 68Ge source, SUV from PET/MRI is measured lower 88.55% compared to PET/CT. In case of liquid 18F uniform phantom, SUV of PET/MRI as compared to PET/CT is measured low 70.17%. If the clinical study, the background SUV of PET/MRI is same with PET/CT's and the one of lung was higher 2.51%. However, it is measured lower about 32.50, 40.35, 23.92, 13.92, 5.00% at liver, brain, muscle, fat, femoral head.

Conclusion: In the case of a CT image, because there is a linear relationship between 511 keV ¥ã-ray and linear absorption coefficient of X-ray, it is possible to correct directly the attenuation of 511 keV ¥ã-ray by creating a ¥ìmap from the CT image. However, in the case of the MRI, because the MRI signal has no relationship at all with linear absorption coefficient of ¥ã-ray, the anatomical structure of the human body is divided into four segmentations to correct the attenuation of ¥ã-rays. Even a number of protons in a bone is too low to make MRI signal and to localize segmentation of ¥ì-map. Therefore, to develope a proper sequence for measuring more accurate attenuation coefficient is indeed necessary in the future PET/MRI.
KEYWORD
PET/MRI, PET/CT, SUV, Attenuation correction
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information